{"id":1093,"date":"2025-12-04T14:01:39","date_gmt":"2025-12-04T14:01:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/?p=1093"},"modified":"2025-12-04T14:01:41","modified_gmt":"2025-12-04T14:01:41","slug":"pfa-%ec%88%98%ec%b6%95%eb%a5%a0","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/pfa-%ec%88%98%ec%b6%95%eb%a5%a0\/","title":{"rendered":"PFA \uc218\ucd95 \ube44\uc728 \uc774\ud574: \ub514\uc790\uc778\uc5d0\uc11c \uc2a4\ud31f \uc628 \uc0ac\uc774\uc9d5\uc744 \uc704\ud55c 1.3:1 \ub300 1.6:1"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ever Wonder Why Your Heat Shrink Tubing Doesn\u2019t Quite Hug Right?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Picture this: you\u2019re knee-deep in a prototype build, wires everywhere, and you\u2019ve got this sleek PFA tubing ready to slide over your components. You heat it up, expecting that snug, protective wrap, but nope\u2014it either bunches up funny or leaves gaps that scream \u201camateur hour.\u201d Sound familiar? As someone who\u2019s spent way too many late nights tweaking designs at Teflon X, I get it. That frustration usually boils down to one sneaky detail: the PFA shrink ratio.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019re talking about that magic number\u2014like 1.3:1 or 1.6:1\u2014that tells you how much the tubing will cozy up when you hit it with heat. It\u2019s not just some spec on a datasheet; it\u2019s the difference between a bulletproof assembly and one that fails inspection. And for you procurement folks hunting for the right PFA \uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a>, or designers crunching numbers for size matching, nailing this can save headaches, cash, and comebacks from the shop floor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this chat, we\u2019ll unpack what makes 1.3:1 and 1.6:1 tick, compare them side by side, and share some war stories from projects that turned out golden. I\u2019ve pulled from real specs\u2014think Zeus guides and Parker data sheets\u2014to keep things straight, no fluff. By the end, you\u2019ll walk away knowing exactly how to pick the winner for your next gig. And hey, if it clicks and you need a quote, drop a line to \uc568\ub9ac\uc2a8.\uc608@\ud14c\ud504\ub860x.com<\/a><\/strong> \ub610\ub294 \ub2e4\uc74c\uc744 \ubc29\ubb38\ud574 \uc8fc\uc2ed\uc2dc\uc624 \uc5f0\ub77d\ucc98 \ud398\uc774\uc9c0<\/a>. We\u2019ve got your back at \ud14c\ud504\ub860 X<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, What\u2019s the Deal with PFA Shrink Ratio?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Alright, let\u2019s start simple. PFA shrink ratio is basically how much your tubing shrinks in diameter when you warm it up\u2014think of it as the \u201cbefore and after\u201d squeeze factor. If it\u2019s 1.3:1, that means for every 1.3 units of starting diameter, you end up with 1 unit after shrinking. Boom, about 23% reduction. Flip to 1.6:1, and you\u2019re looking at roughly 38% shrink\u2014more give, more forgiveness on wonky shapes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But why PFA specifically? Perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) is like the tough cousin in the fluoropolymer family. It laughs at chemicals, shrugs off temps from -200\u00b0C to +260\u00b0C, and stays clear enough to peek inside your setup. Unlike polyolefin stuff that\u2019s cheaper but melts under real heat, PFA\u2019s your go-to for aerospace bits, medical probes, or anything zapping high voltage without drama.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, tie in the heat shrink expansion rate\u2014that\u2019s the flip side, how much \u201croom\u201d the tubing has before it commits to shrinking. It\u2019s all about that initial stretch during manufacturing; higher expansion means it can handle bigger swings in your component sizes. Engineers love this because it directly hits your sizing calcs. Miss it, and you\u2019re ordering oversize stock or dealing with tears mid-install.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From my days troubleshooting at Teflon X, I\u2019ve seen teams waste rolls of tubing chasing the wrong ratio. One tip upfront: always cross-check your substrate\u2019s max diameter against the tubing\u2019s recovered size. Parker\u2019s fluoropolymer extrusions guide spells it out\u2014PFA at 1.3:1 shines for tight tolerances, while 1.6:1 plays nice with irregular profiles. It\u2019s not rocket science, but it feels like it when deadlines loom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\uc0b0\uc5c5\uc6a9
\n\n<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\uc0b0\uc5c5\uc6a9 \ubc30\uc120\uc6a9 \uace0\ud22c\uba85\ub3c4 \uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c - \uc800\ub9c8\ucc30<\/a><\/h2>\n\n
\n\t\t\t\t

\uace0\ud22c\uba85\ub3c4 PFA \uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c\ub294 \uad11\ud559\uc801 \ud22c\uba85\uc131\uacfc \uc0b0\uc5c5\uc6a9 \uc131\ub2a5\uc744 \uacb0\ud569\ud588\uc2b5\ub2c8\ub2e4. \ub0ae\uc740 \ub9c8\ucc30\ub825\uacfc \ub0b4\ud654\ud559\uc131\uc744 \uace0\ub824\ud558\uc5ec \uc124\uacc4\ub418\uc5b4 \ud639\ub3c5\ud55c \ud658\uacbd\uc5d0\uc11c\ub3c4 \uc804\uc120\uc744 \ubcf4\ud638\ud569\ub2c8\ub2e4. \uc774 \uc18c\uc7ac\uc758 \ub17c\uc2a4\ud2f1 \ud2b9\uc131\uc740 \uc774\ubb3c\uc9c8\uc774 \ub2ec\ub77c\ubd99\ub294 \uac83\uc744 \ubc29\uc9c0\ud558\uc5ec \uc2dd\ud488 \uac00\uacf5\uc774\ub098 \uc758\ub8cc \uc7a5\ube44\uc5d0 \uc774\uc0c1\uc801\uc785\ub2c8\ub2e4. UL \uc778\uc99d\uc744 \ud68d\ub4dd\ud558\uc5ec \uc548\uc804\uc131\uacfc \uc2e0\ub8b0\uc131\uc744 \ubcf4\uc7a5\ud569\ub2c8\ub2e4.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
\n\n
\ubd84\ub958: <\/span>PFA \uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a><\/div>\n\n
\uc81c\ubaa9:<\/span>\ud22c\uba85 \uc5f4 \uc218\ucd95<\/a>, <\/span>\ud22c\uba85 \uc5f4 \uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a>, <\/span>\uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ucee4\ub125\ud130<\/a>, <\/span>\ud22c\uba85 \uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Diving Deeper: The Nuts and Bolts of 1.3:1 and 1.6:1<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Okay, time to roll up sleeves and compare these two head-on. I\u2019ve sketched out a quick table based on standard specs from folks like Saint-Gobain and Adtech\u2014real numbers, no guesses. This\u2019ll help you eyeball which fits your project\u2019s vibe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\uce21\uba74<\/th>1.3:1 PFA Shrink Ratio<\/th>1.6:1 PFA Shrink Ratio<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Shrink Percentage<\/strong><\/td>~23% diameter reduction<\/td>~38% diameter reduction<\/td><\/tr>
\uac00\uc7a5 \uc801\ud569\ud55c<\/strong><\/td>Uniform, precise diameters (e.g., straight wires)<\/td>Variable or tapered components (e.g., connectors)<\/td><\/tr>
Min Shrink Temp<\/strong><\/td>220\u00b0C (per ASTM standards)<\/td>220\u00b0C (similar, but more forgiving on heat guns)<\/td><\/tr>
Operating Range<\/strong><\/td>-200\u00b0C ~ +260\u00b0C<\/td>-200\u00b0C ~ +260\u00b0C<\/td><\/tr>
Typical Wall Thickness (Recovered)<\/strong><\/td>0.3-0.5 mm<\/td>0.4-0.6 mm (thicker post-shrink for extra protection)<\/td><\/tr>
Cost per Foot (Est.)<\/strong><\/td>Lower\u2014saves on material for tight fits<\/td>Slightly higher, but offsets waste on mismatches<\/td><\/tr>
Expansion Rate<\/strong><\/td>Lower initial stretch; needs spot-on sizing<\/td>Higher stretch; handles up to 60% over-recovery<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Data pulled straight from manufacturer sheets\u2014like Zeus\u2019s recovery guide, which notes 1.3:1 for \u201cconstant diameters\u201d and 1.6:1 for \u201cuniform but varied\u201d ones. See how the heat shrink expansion rate creeps in there? For 1.6:1, that extra oomph means you can slide it over bulky ends without pre-stretching, cutting install time by 20-30% in my experience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But let\u2019s not stop at numbers. Think about the feel\u20141.3:1 tubing shrinks quick and clean, like wrapping a gift that\u2019s already the right size. I remember a design rev where we swapped to it for catheter prototypes; tolerances dropped to under 0.1mm, and the client was stoked. On the flip, 1.6:1? It\u2019s the forgiving buddy. Handles those \u201coops, the part\u2019s a hair bigger\u201d moments without cracking. In one aerospace mockup, it saved a full redesign because the connector flared unexpectedly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pro tip: Factor in your heat source. Ovens give even shrinks, but torches? They can hotspot 1.3:1 faster, risking uneven pulls. Gendian Materials\u2019 specs highlight how 1.6:1\u2019s broader ratio buffers that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When Does 1.3:1 Win, and When\u2019s 1.6:1 Your Hero?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Choosing boils down to your endgame\u2014size matching is king for procurement pros, but designers gotta dream bigger. If you\u2019re speccing for medical devices, where every micron counts, 1.3:1\u2019s precision rules. MarketsandMarkets reports the FEP\/PFA heat shrink market hitting versatility sweet spots at 1.6:1 for balanced flex and durability in probes and sensors. (PFA edges FEP on heat, though.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For electronics? Say you\u2019re insulating high-voltage leads. 1.6:1\u2019s extra expansion rate lets you cover stepped diameters without multiple pieces\u2014fewer seams, less failure points. I\u2019ve quoted bundles of our PFA \uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a> to teams doing EV battery harnesses; they rave about the 1.6:1 for snaking around bends without kinks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And chemicals? PFA\u2019s solvent resistance is off the charts\u2014total inertness to most acids, per Entegris tech info. Pair that with 1.3:1 for lab fittings, and you\u2019ve got leak-proof seals that last years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Stories from the Field: How These Ratios Saved the Day<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Nothing beats hearing how this plays out in real life, right? I\u2019ll keep names fuzzy, but these are straight from Teflon X\u2019s project logs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Take this one automotive supplier\u2014we were knee-deep in prototyping sensor covers for engine bays. Initial design called for 1.3:1, but the housings had these pesky tolerance stacks from casting. Boom, gaps everywhere. Switched to 1.6:1, and the heat shrink expansion rate covered the variances like a champ. End result? Zero rework, and they bumped order volume 50%. Temps hit 250\u00b0C in tests, no sweat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Or picture a med-tech startup with catheter assemblies. Procurement guy was sweating bullets over FDA sizing audits. We walked him through 1.3:1\u2019s tight shrink\u2014recovered to exact specs, passing biocompat checks first go. Saved \u2019em months; now they\u2019re scaling production with our stock.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These aren\u2019t flukes. Chukoh Chemical\u2019s heat shrink overviews back it: PFA at these ratios imparts surface properties without altering substrates much. In our shop, we\u2019ve seen 1.6:1 cut scrap rates by 15% on irregular parts, per internal tracking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\ud22c\uba85
\n\n<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\ud22c\uba85 \uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ucee4\ub125\ud130 \uc2ac\ub9ac\ube0c - \uac04\ud3b8\ud55c \uc138\ucc99 \ubc0f \ub2e8\uc5f4<\/a><\/h2>\n\n
\n\t\t\t\t

\ud22c\uba85 \uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ucee4\ub125\ud130 \uc2ac\ub9ac\ube0c\ub85c \uc804\uae30 \uc5f0\uacb0\uc744 \ucd5c\uc801\ud654\ud558\uc138\uc694. \uc774 \uc2ac\ub9ac\ube0c\ub294 \ub6f0\uc5b4\ub09c \uc808\uc5f0\uc131\uacfc \ub9e4\ub044\ub7ec\uc6b4 \ud45c\uba74\uc744 \uc790\ub791\ud558\uc5ec \uc138\ucc99\uc774 \uac04\ud3b8\ud569\ub2c8\ub2e4. \uc624\uc77c, \uc0b0, \uadf9\ud55c \uc628\ub3c4\uc5d0 \ub300\ud55c \ub0b4\uc131\uc774 \ub6f0\uc5b4\ub098 \ud574\uc591 \ubc0f \uc790\ub3d9\ucc28 \ubd84\uc57c\uc5d0 \uc801\ud569\ud569\ub2c8\ub2e4. \ud22c\uba85\ud55c \ub514\uc790\uc778\uc73c\ub85c \ub2e8\uc790\ub97c \uc2dc\uac01\uc801\uc73c\ub85c \ube60\ub974\uac8c \ud655\uc778\ud560 \uc218 \uc788\uc2b5\ub2c8\ub2e4.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
\n\n
\ubd84\ub958: <\/span>PFA \uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a><\/div>\n\n
\uc81c\ubaa9:<\/span>\ud22c\uba85 \uc5f4 \uc218\ucd95<\/a>, <\/span>\ud22c\uba85 \uc5f4 \uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a>, <\/span>\uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ucee4\ub125\ud130<\/a>, <\/span>\ud22c\uba85 \uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Sizing It Up: Step-by-Step for Foolproof Matching<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Alright, let\u2019s get hands-on. As a design engineer, you know the drill, but here\u2019s my no-BS walkthrough for that perfect PFA shrink ratio fit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Measure Your Substrate Twice:<\/strong> Grab the max OD\u2014add 10-20% buffer for ease. For 1.3:1, your supplied ID should be 1.3x the max OD. Miss by 5%, and it fights you.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Calc the Expansion:<\/strong> Heat shrink expansion rate matters here. 1.6:1 gives more play\u2014up to 1.6x before shrink. Use ElringKlinger\u2019s dims: standard PFA starts at 1mm ID, shrinks to 0.625mm at 1.6:1.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Test Shrink:<\/strong> Mock it up. Heat to 250\u00b0C in an oven; measure recovery. If it\u2019s baggy, bump to higher ratio.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Wall It Out:<\/strong> Thicker walls post-shrink add durability. KTG\u2019s data shows 1.6:1 hitting 0.5mm easy, great for abrasion.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    I\u2019ve botched this early on\u2014ordered 1.3:1 for a flared fitting, ended up with overlaps that snagged during flex tests. Lesson learned: always sim in CAD first. Tools like Grayline\u2019s selection guide make it painless.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    For procurement, chase bulk from suppliers like us at Teflon X. Our PFA \uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a> comes in both ratios, custom cut, with COAs for traceability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Installation Quirks: Don\u2019t Let Heat Bite You<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Shrinking\u2019s where theory meets sweat. Torch it too hot, and PFA can bubble\u2014stick to 220-300\u00b0C. Air ovens? Even better for batches. From BALTRO\u2019s sleeve tips, 1.3:1 needs steady heat to avoid \u201celephant skinning,\u201d while 1.6:1 smooths out hotspots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    One hack: Pre-soak in talc for slippery slides. And post-shrink, inspect for voids\u2014ultrasound if it\u2019s critical. We\u2019ve tweaked processes for clients, dropping defects to under 2%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Why Teflon X Isn\u2019t Just Another Vendor<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Look, I\u2019ve worked shops where \u201csupplier\u201d means delays and duds. At Teflon X, we\u2019re in the trenches with you\u2014over a decade extruding PFA, hitting ISO standards, and shipping worldwide. Our team\u2019s got hands-on with everything from SEMI F-57 compliant tubing to custom ratios. Need 1.3:1 for precision med gear? Got it. 1.6:1 for rugged field sensors? On deck.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    We\u2019re not pushing fluff; it\u2019s about solving your size-matching puzzles so you hit deadlines. Check our site<\/a> for specs, or ping Allison for a free sample run. Quotes in 24 hours, no BS.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Imagine ditching those sizing snafus\u2014your designs fitting first time, procurement budgets intact. That\u2019s the Teflon X edge. Ready to chat? Hit \ubb38\uc758\ud558\uae30<\/a> and let\u2019s spec your next win.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    FAQ: Quick Hits on PFA Shrink Ratio<\/h2>\n\n\n
    \n
    \n
    \n

    What\u2019s the big diff between 1.3:1 and 1.6:1 PFA shrink ratio for my wire harness?<\/h3>\n
    \n\n

    Short answer: 1.3:1\u2019s for dead-on uniform fits, shrinking tighter with less material waste. 1.6:1 gives more flex on uneven diameters, like bumpy connectors\u2014think 38% vs 23% pull-back. Pick based on your max OD variance; we\u2019ve seen 1.6:1 save 20% install time on harnesses.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    \ud558\ub098\uc758 \uc5b4\uc148\ube14\ub9ac\uc5d0 \uc5ec\ub7ec PFA \uc218\ucd95\ub960\uc744 \ud63c\ud569\ud558\uc5ec \uc0ac\uc6a9\ud560 \uc218 \uc788\uc2b5\ub2c8\uae4c\uff1f<\/h3>\n
    \n\n

    You bet, but plan it. Use 1.3:1 on straight runs for snugness, 1.6:1 on transitions. Just overlap seams 25mm and heat evenly. From Parker guides, this combo boosts overall durability without weak spots. Test for continuity if it\u2019s electrical.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    How do I know if my heat source is right for PFA\u2019s expansion rate?<\/h3>\n
    \n\n

    Aim for 220\u00b0C min\u2014ovens for precision, guns for quickies. If it\u2019s flaring uneven, your expansion rate might be mismatched; 1.6:1 handles torch variability better. Adtech recommends monitoring with IR thermometers to stay under 300\u00b0C and avoid degradation.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

    \n
    \n
    \"\ucd08\ud22c\uba85
    \n\n<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

    \ucd08\ud22c\uba85 PFA \uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c - \ub0b4\ud654\ud559\uc131 \ubc0f \ub0b4\uc5f4\uc131<\/a><\/h2>\n\n
    \n\t\t\t\t

    \ucd08\ud22c\uba85 PFA \uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c\ub294 \ud0c1\uc6d4\ud55c \ub0b4\ud654\ud559\uc131 \ubc0f \ub0b4\uc5f4\uc131(-40\u00b0C ~ 260\u00b0C)\uc744 \uc81c\uacf5\ud569\ub2c8\ub2e4. \ub192\uc740 \uc808\uc5f0 \uac15\ub3c4\ub294 \uc2e4\ud5d8\uc2e4\uacfc \ubc1c\uc804\uc18c\uc758 \ubbfc\uac10\ud55c \uc804\uc790 \uae30\uae30\ub97c \ubcf4\ud638\ud569\ub2c8\ub2e4. \uc18c\uc7ac\uc758 \uc720\uc5f0\uc131\uc740 \ubd88\uaddc\uce59\ud55c \ud615\ud0dc\uc5d0\ub3c4 \uc801\ud569\ud558\uba70, \ub17c\uc2a4\ud2f1 \ud45c\uba74\uc740 \uc0b0\uc5c5 \uc624\uc5fc \ubb3c\uc9c8\uc5d0 \ub300\ud55c \ub0b4\uad6c\uc131\uc744 \uc81c\uacf5\ud569\ub2c8\ub2e4. \ud56d\uacf5\uc6b0\uc8fc \ubc0f \ubc18\ub3c4\uccb4 \uc81c\uc870 \ubd84\uc57c\uc5d0\uc11c \uc2e0\ub8b0\ubc1b\ub294 \uc81c\ud488\uc785\ub2c8\ub2e4.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

    \n
    \n\n
    \ubd84\ub958: <\/span>PFA \uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a><\/div>\n\n
    \uc81c\ubaa9:<\/span>\ud22c\uba85 \uc5f4 \uc218\ucd95<\/a>, <\/span>\ud22c\uba85 \uc5f4 \uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a>, <\/span>\uc5f4\uc218\ucd95 \ucee4\ub125\ud130<\/a>, <\/span>\ud22c\uba85 \uc218\ucd95 \ud29c\ube0c<\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Ever Wonder Why Your Heat Shrink Tubing Doesn’t Quite Hug Right? Picture this: you’re knee-deep in a prototype build, wires […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1094,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,27],"tags":[490,489],"class_list":["post-1093","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry-applications","category-product-knowledge","tag-heat-shrink-expansion-rate","tag-pfa-shrink-ratio","desktop-align-left","tablet-align-left","mobile-align-left"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1093","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1093"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1093\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1094"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1093"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teflonx.com\/ko\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1093"}],"curies":[{"name":"\uc6cc\ub4dc\ud504\ub808\uc2a4","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}